[color=#ff9900]First, what Fred said. If the argument has become about how popular everyone’s opinions are, the useful bit of the argument has passed.[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]Second:[/color]
[color=#ff9900]To my knowledge, the number of emails we’ve received about this is zero. Also to my knowledge, we haven’t made any changes to the zailing part of this story in response to feedback.[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]Third, I wanted to shed a little light on a topic based on this:[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]The word "majority" is tricky, here. It’s worth remembering that:[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]1. A tiny proportion of players post on this forum[/color]
[color=#ff9900]2. A tinier proportion read/comment/rate a particular thread or post[/color]
[color=#ff9900]3. People who are cross about something are vastly more likely to post than people who were happy with it[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]Any discussion here is already a minority, and pluses or minuses on a post are too tiny a figure to be reliable data. [/color][color=rgb(255, 153, 0)]We love our forum and get a huge amount of valuable feedback from it. It’s crucial. But do be aware it’s far from our only source of information. We have access to a bunch of sources and data that guide our decisions. Plus, concerns like artistic intention and experimentation are important to us, too.[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]And even if we were talking about pleasing a minority of players, I’d say we often address minority desires and concerns. Writing content about ubergoats is an extreme example! Mr Eaten content is another. In Exceptional Friend stories we like to explore different areas of lore, different mechanics, different paces, different conflicts, different themes, different responses. Our player base is hugely diverse, and each story is a chance to reach out to a different part of it. [/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=#ff9900]The single most difficult thing I learned when I started writing for an FBG-sized audience was that they are a vast, labyrinthine, glorious, beautiful venn diagram of preferences, interests and passions. Often there is no majority. Coming to see how little my own preferences - indeed, anyone’s preferences - were representative was… well, let’s say humbling.[/color]
[color=#ff9900]
[/color]
[color=rgb(255, 153, 0)]It’s also worth mentioning that our response to feedback may well not be to change a particular thing under discussion. It might be to handle it differently in future, or to change a connected bit of content, or to stick to our guns (for any number of reasons). I wouldn’t want the forum to descend into a "lobbying" culture, because it’s current debate culture is so much more insightful and useful to us.[/color]
[color=rgb(255, 153, 0)]
[/color]
[color=rgb(255, 153, 0)]TL;DR: this stuff is complicated. Remember that the forum tends to represent a particular subculture of motivated, eloquent, super-engaged players. We relish feedback, but our response to it may not be what you’re expecting. The discussion is the fun and useful bit, not who’s right or wrong (because "right" and "wrong" are often erroneous concepts in matters like this).[/color]