[quote=Sir Reginald Monteroy]This one in particular seems to imply that we have encountered the very same Creditor: Fallen London
That, plus various jabs and insinuations the tellingly named Creditor’s Solicitor makes towards the Bazaar and its credibility.
Though, of course, certainty is a tricky subject when we’re dealing with sentient geo-archaeological entities.
EDIT:
[quote=Amalgamate]I’m going to go with the calendar option… July, September, and the Jovial Contrarian (and Furnace) are my board anyway! (Plus or minus a tentacled entrepreneur.)
[/quote]
I’m actually leaning towards the historical option, as that seems to imply more thought out, informed and Neath-lore-relevant approach. Plus it will perhaps leave more possibilities open for when the looming confrontation between the Bazaar and the Creditor comes. Or at least it leaves open possibility for more conciliatory ones.
In fact, I have half a mind to try "acting for the Bazaar" for the heck of it, just because the Solicitor tried to intimidate me into not doing so…[/quote]
I thought that line meant the Tower is merely aware of the business between the Bazaar and the Creditor. Jabs are reasonable in that case: from the Tower’s perspective whole this mess is rather irritating, no matter how you look.
The Solicitor was not intimidating you: it sounded more like a sincere advice to stay out of this truly epic mess to avoid complicating it even further.
In this case revolutionaries show what they really are: cowards. From their rhetorics one would expect to either enlist Tower’s help against the Bazaar or attack it too, but they’re merely groveling, desperately trying to pretend they aren’t even here.
I think this "greater Power", of which the Tower is part, is the Neath itself.
Also, the architect was reset - you can change station design even after confronting the Tower.
edited by Aro Saren on 1/20/2021