[quote=A B Nile][quote=Kylestien][quote=A B Nile]I don’t want to speak for FB, but I think you might have the wrong end of the stick as far as Fate is concerned. The game is not designed in order to get people to spend Fate. If you feel you don’t want to pay, then no problem - don’t. There are plenty of other mechanics available for Menace reductions - they just take a bit longer, or require you to use social actions.
Introducing a mechanic of the kind you describe would put many players in the position of feeling that they had to spend the Fate or else be suffering a significant disadvantage. And that in turn would put a lot of people off from playing what is meant to be a free-to-play game.[/quote]
I can see the possible issue here, which is why I will say I don’t think it a simple do this or not option and reckon it would be best for a compromise that keeps the free to play ideals of this game while also offering the suggestion. Also, I’d like to add the menace thing was only a example, and possibly a bad one at that. Maybe something like The Temple of Uttermost Wind would be a better example: I would have to pay 7 fate each time I wish to play that event and that can be annoying as is what with the expedition costs and chance of failure too, and it’s possible however unlikly someone may take the expedition without enough tools and effectively waste 7 nex.
I have spent Nex and fate on this game, and will be happy to continue to do so since the game is a good qaulity and enjoyable, but my point as it were is that I feel with things like menaces costing 3 fate to rid entirely EACH time (not that i have ever done this), storylets costing Nex to repeat, actionrefills and deck refills for nex (Though I see them as needed) a ton of other smaller options like paying nex in the House of Chimes to go Shroom Hopping, and most importantly not knowing what I will get aside from a short description offering something good or saying I need 30 supplies, It feels like my Nex goes too quickly and sometimes to things I may not even want till it’s too late, or it is wasted on something i cannot yet do for some reason. Granted, I do not buy MUCH Nex, only about £5’s worth when I top up my phone, but it’s still £5 of phone credit that can go towards important calls instead.[/quote]
I think the point is that spending Nex is absolutely not essential to enjoyment of the game. You might feel that you don’t get good value for your Nex when you do spend it, but I would disagree. Action refreshes and deck refills are only needed if you’re impatient. Again, the creators don’t want people to blow through all the content quickly. That’s what the Action system is for in the first place - to slow things down. Menaces have other ways around them as already mentioned. Changing story choices is something I think it’s perfectly justifiable to charge a premium for in a game where choices are meant to have consequences.
Expeditions are an even better example of it being fair to charge Fate every time, since they are insanely profitable. If you only had to pay once, every player would feel that they had to do so or face losing out substantially. One could also argue that the only reason to repeat an Expedition is to gain the reward (as opposed to exploring more parts of the story). Why should you be able to repeat that for free?
A separate point you make is not knowing in advance what you’re spending it on, which is true - but I think it’s obvious why that’s the case. In any case, you can always get pointers (though not full spoilers) on the forum - there are many threads discussing whether particular Fate content is worth paying for. This thread is a good place to start: http://community.failbettergames.com/topic87-fatelocked-content.aspx
I spend Nex on the game too, but I try to be judicious about when I do it. People will always have strong views where their money is involved, and I do think it’s good to explore the subject, but my personal opinion is that Fate locked stuff is pretty much all fair and well-balanced.
[li][/li][li][/li]
edited by A B Nile on 10/8/2014[/quote]
I would not necessarily go so far as to call it unfair, and I can see your point. However I think it could possibly be done in a better way. What said better way would be however I have no idea. if you have a idea on the subject I’d love to hear it because I sure don’t. I’m sure there is a reasonable compromise or different idea between the two ideals. (;