Some folks’ pursuit of preposterously high levels of quirk are well-known, but even among the rest of us, not all quirks are created equal. We’re seeing more use of these qualities - feeding Nomen, catching fish - and it’s got me thinking about which I’d preserve and which I’d cast off. What quirks would you say define your characters?
For instance, Sir Frederick is, more or less, me, except considerably more competent and adventurous. So, well, I’m not going to pretend to be any sort of paragon, but I value being an honest, decent, straightforward sort of person, so Magnanimous and Steadfast are high on the list. I can’t deny that the world gets me down sometimes, too, so Melancholy would have to be on the list.
Hubris is quick to advance his own interests and slow to consider other people’s - Heartless is thoroughly appropriate. He’s got a fierce temper, too - Forceful describes him well. These two traits combine to create a thoroughly conniving, amoral sort of person - he’s definitely Ruthless.
Juniper has much to be Melancholy about, having lost her entire family in a series of unlikely tragedies. Years of fending for herself, living in society’s shadow, have made her Subtle by necessity. Finally, she still carries her religious upbringing - she has a strong Austere streak.
Finally, Esther has devoted her life to the socialist cause - she’s undoubtedly Steadfast. She also enjoys a certain devil-may-care lifestyle, and could be described as a Hedonist. She’s still ready to put her ideals into practice, however, whatever the danger - no-one could call her anything but Daring.