It just seems kind of strange imagining a result that has no relation at all to what is visible. Some of the predictions of a "Feducci majority" for example are based on nothing but blackbox assumptions.
.
edited by Anne Auclair on 7/10/2017
I think what they’re trying to say is that your sample size is small compared to the whole.
At the same time, even if the size is small, I do think people are a little quick to dismiss it out-of-hand. I personally think it’s shocking, surprising, and for those of us supporting the Campaigner, very encouraging.
We’ll just have to see.
The Huffam poll was vague and out of date the moment it was printed, given the dynamics of the race changed visibly and dramatically. Plus there were a few hints that Feducci’s lead wasn’t actually that great.
btw, I sent out some last minute pamphlets, because why not? And I found yet another person who abandoned Feducci because of the second week revelations. It’s odd that I just keep bumping into these people when they’re supposedly such a small minority.
edited by Anne Auclair on 7/10/2017
Call it a hunch, but I think Feduchini is going to win.
You know what, Tyssy?
We’re dueling now.
(chanting from the sidelines) FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
BOINK! BOINK! BOINK!
I told you no one was going to get a majority.
[quote=] You know what, Tyssy?
We’re dueling now. [/quote]
looks at clock
Crap… I’m four hours late to posting a reply…
UH, I MEAN… I HAVEN’T PREPPED MY HOUSE WITH BOOBY-TRAPS YET!