SarahTheEntwife
Posts: 50
4/18/2014
|
Random thought -- does the "infiltrate a gentlemen's club" card have a higher difficulty level if your character identifies as female? That seems like an obvious type of adventure to have slightly different descriptions depending on your character's gender, and I was intrigued that it didn't seem to.
--
http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Strel Retired zee-captain turned scholar. Open to social interactions of various sorts.
http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Winona~Tintenfisch Winona Tintenfisch, aspiring street urchin. Would definitely be up for some fisticuffs or loitering.
|
|
|
0
link
|
xKiv
Posts: 846
4/18/2014
|
This is Fallen London. A lady can be a gentleman if she wants to.
--
https://www.fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/xKiv - a witchful, percussive, dangermous and shadowry scholar of coexplodence, hopsidirean, and walker of fallen kitties.
|
|
|
+7
link
|
Diptych
Administrator
Posts: 3493
4/23/2014
|
Man, what nineteenth-century social organisations -weren't- run by women? ...okay, a lot of the ones that considered themselves the most important, but still. Charities, church affairs, political campaigning, economic organisation, academia, science, salons, secret occult societies... you don't have to look far to find women making things happen. Most of the explicitly feminine ones I can think of - ones that are still active today - are early-20th century rather than late-19th, but they had many predecessors. God's Editors is probably a good example, actually - revising Biblical literature seems to attract the ladylike scholars of the Neath.
--
Sir Frederick, the Libertarian Esotericist. Lord Hubris, the Bloody Baron.
Juniper Brown, the Ill-Fated Orphan. Esther Ellis-Hall, the Fashionable Fabian.
|
|
|
+3
link
|
Diptych
Administrator
Posts: 3493
4/23/2014
|
Also, we don't know much about Fallen London's legislative branch, but there's at least one female parliamentarian in whatever remains of the House of Commons, so women can stand for government - that doesn't necessarily mean they can vote, I admit, and I do recall the evidence being unclear on that point in other cards.
--
Sir Frederick, the Libertarian Esotericist. Lord Hubris, the Bloody Baron.
Juniper Brown, the Ill-Fated Orphan. Esther Ellis-Hall, the Fashionable Fabian.
|
|
|
+2
link
|
babelfishwars
Administrator
Posts: 1152
4/18/2014
|
SarahTheEntwife wrote:
Random thought -- does the "infiltrate a gentlemen's club" card have a higher difficulty level if your character identifies as female? That seems like an obvious type of adventure to have slightly different descriptions depending on your character's gender, and I was intrigued that it didn't seem to.
I *think* nothing in FL depends on character sex (anyone want to confirm or deny?). Because FL is a liberal and permissive society. Oh no, wait it's not. *grin* But (I'm guessing) because it would be extremely difficult to balance things such that it wasn't really annoying were male/female/not telling characters treated differently. It's bad enough that it happens in real life.
While I see your point, perhaps it would be tending too much towards realism without being particularly narratively interesting? If it's a compromise, I think it's an easy one to see which way is the 'right' way to go. And maybe I just have a boyish figure and am easily disguised. Dresses etc. aren't character sex limited.
If you want to weave in-game lore around it - perhaps it's telling that while the Bazaar needs love stories, it doesn't really seem matter whom (who? gah. Words.) they're between. Perhaps it cares more for quality of person involved rather than type of person, and this attitude has trickled down to society where (see above, xKiv's post) 'gentleman' is more status based than sex based? There are better and more educated lore weavers than me. This could be a topic they could chew?
edited by babelfishwars on 4/18/2014
--
Mars, God of Fish; Leaning Tower of Fish
|
|
|
+2
link
|
ruen
Posts: 47
4/23/2014
|
I'm a lady, but I've got a ratskin suit and a sneak-thief's mask--I'm pretty certain I can infiltrate anything.
--
http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Ruen
|
|
|
+1
link
|
Owen Wulf
Posts: 715
4/23/2014
|
Personally, I think it is odd that the guys at Failbetter didn't provide any Feminine Affiliations for us guys to join... I mean, to give the ladies the option of course.
--
 Owen Wulf's Profile  Lanzo Hoffman’s Profile  Lukas Uller’s Profile
|
|
|
+1
link
|
babelfishwars
Administrator
Posts: 1152
4/23/2014
|
Owen Wulf wrote:
Personally, I think it is odd that the guys at Failbetter didn't provide any Feminine Affiliations for us guys to join... I mean, to give the ladies the option of course.
You get a choice between joining the gentlemen for cigars / ladies for gossip at the society dinner thing.
What would be a parallel to a gentlemen's club? A suffrage movement? Hmm. My knowledge of relevant real world history is nil. :-(
--
Mars, God of Fish; Leaning Tower of Fish
|
|
|
+1
link
|
babelfishwars
Administrator
Posts: 1152
4/23/2014
|
Sir Frederick Tanah-Chook wrote:
Man, what nineteenth-century social organisations -weren't- run by women? ...okay, a lot of the ones that considered themselves the most important, but still. Charities, church affairs, political campaigning, economic organisation, academia, science, salons, secret occult societies... you don't have to look far to find women making things happen. Most of the explicitly feminine ones I can think of - ones that are still active today - are early-20th century rather than late-19th, but they had many predecessors. God's Editors is probably a good example, actually - revising Biblical literature seems to attract the ladylike scholars of the Neath.
Interesting. It's weird how little I know about certain periods of history (my vague awareness of things comes from unreliable films/fiction). I vaguely recall studying the field rotation system, and then history leaped 'a little' forward to WW2. School left me with gaps.
--
Mars, God of Fish; Leaning Tower of Fish
|
|
|
+1
link
|