Powered by Jitbit .Net Forum free trial version.

HomeFallen London » Election

A place for in-game political discussion.

THE TRUTH ABOUT FEDUCCI Messages in this topic - RSS

Anne Auclair
Anne Auclair
Posts: 2215

6/29/2017
(1) Feducci makes grand promises to bring about a fairer London, but his character and past actions cast grave doubts as to whether he actually believes what he says.

Feducci is a false-Tomb Colonist, an invincible immortal man wrapped in stolen bandages who feigns a limp and a cough. He presents himself in such a way so he can lure people into his private fighting club and slaughter them in a duel to the permanent death. Duels to the death where the reigning champion cannot possibly be harmed, let alone killed, are hardly fair by any definition of the word. And of course Feducci is not content the advantages granted by his invincibility, he also goes to his duels proudly astride a warhorse in order to face opponents who fight on foot.

Feducci has had so many of these dishonest duels and has slaughtered so many unsuspecting opponents that he goes into battle with his arms wrapped in black ribbons:

“If that were not bad enough, his arms are swathed in enough black ribbons to hide his bandages. There are dozens of them: how many of his own society has he killed?”

Each of those ribbons taken from a man or woman who Feducci permanently murdered in an unfair, thoroughly one-sided duel.

___

(2) When not permanently killing lesser mortals for sport, Feducci serves as the Presbyters Agent in London. Feducci’s clandestine activities are whispered about in the Flit and is regularly seen delivering reports and relics to Presbyter zailors. But the strongest testimony comes from one of his former associates in Venderbight’s Grand Sanatorium, which was uncovered by a gentleman seeking his Nemeses:

http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/ShowMore/434443/EventConclusion?contentKey=15023

Feducci, in his capacity as the Presbyter’s Agent in London, regularly commissions the murder of London citizens, particularly those whose existence is condemned by Holy Presbyterate Law.

http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/ShowMore/7099710/EventConclusion?contentKey=13494

As the recent election campaign has established, Feducci is being paid by the Presbyter for these services. These payments are laundered through under-zee commercial transactions. Feducci invests in a speculative venture that a London company is hoping to make with the government controlled Licensed Exchange at Adam’s Way. The Presbyterate government then agrees to and insures that this venture is profitable. There was never any possibility of Feducci losing his investment.

_____

(3) Just as he has clothed himself in an aura of unearned courage, fighting duels that cannot possibly hurt him, Feducci has cultivated a reputation as a winner by repeatedly gambling with loaded dice. And yet this man promises to even the odds in London?

The Presbyter is getting something for all this money – that is obvious. If Feducci becomes Mayor he will be indebted for his success to an unfriendly foreign power that lays claim to territories held by London!

Lastly, Feducci has a terrible record when it comes to the people who put their trust in him. We’ve already documented how he treats his fellow duelists in the Black Ribbon – as pawns and disposable amusements! But this goes back a long way. When he still resided on the Elder Continent, Feducci went on a pilgrimage to the brambled city of Arbour:

“Feducci was a celebrated figure, attended by lovers, well-wishers and flatterers. Many begged to accompany him, and a company of seventy-seven embarked with pennants, wine, and song.

…One by one, Feducci's companions fell, but he refused to turn back. When he reached the rosebrick gate, he was alone.”

So ask yourself, would a false gambler like Feducci wager on the odds he has given you – that electing a cheater and schemer would somehow make London a fairer place? We both know the answer to that.

--
http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Anne%20Auclair
+9 link
John Moose
John Moose
Posts: 276

6/29/2017
(Post moved here from another thread, since the arguments I'm attempting to refute are found here as well and it seems a more suitable thread than the old one.)

It's nice to see all the lively debate and people of course disagree on candidates, but I simply must speak up! This manner of dishonest slander against the future mayor is not to be tolerated!

The duels are fair. At no point does Feducci deny where he's from, and he even hints at not being in the habit of dying easily by disguising himself as a Tomb-Colonist. Besides, he can be killed. Best him in combat, hack him into pieces, sink all those pieces in the zee and let the beasts feast on him. He's not coming back. It's hardly his fault if no one ever takes him seriously. More to the point, a person who thinks it'll be fun to join a duelling society and challenges the leader - a long time leader of a duelling society, if you'll allow a moment for that to sink in - and doesn't expect the leader to have a contingency plan against getting stabbed in the gut is an idiot and the world is better off without them. Crying about an unfair fight to the true death just shows everyone you didn't realise just how balls-deep you were in your dangerous hobbies.

On the second point: London citizens? London citizens? We are talking about the same serial-killing face-stealing monsters here, aren't we? Feducci kills killers that have agreed to a deathmatch, a Snuffer kills whoever's convenient. That Snuffer you really like? The one who you think is a decent fellow, really? Jump on a boat and ask what the face's former owner, or their family, think of the matter. Snuffers will kill people as a fox kills chickens and there's no point to wallow about it endlessly, such is nature's way - but they are not citizens any more than a particularly big and mean sewer rat is, and no Londoner who cares about their fellow humans will be able to keep a straight face while condemning their eradication.

The last point truly shows how little the writer of this hit piece understands the soul of our future leader. For shame!

Feducci understands that the most important quality of a leader is not that they use their followers like chess pieces, or that they go around giving individual hugs and blankets to each and every one. No, a leader is an example, an ideal the masses may follow! Feducci shows that courage to act and seize the moment opens to us every door in this life, and he WILL NOT BE BARRED! Feducci is a brazen, charming and unimaginably skilled man, one we could all but hope to emulate! All those followers of his died to be a part of his legacy, to go to the shining new day he himself chases. I ask you, dear readers, what would those that died on the journey have thought of it if he quit halfway, to spare those remaining? What would the survivors have thought? That their friends all died for nothing?

No! Feducci never lost sight of his goal, carrying the memories of his beloved followers on his back, and reached the end of the journey! Every dreamer that has died to put Feducci where he is today will not have died in vain, but to create a legend! One that will echo down the aeons and bring new meaning and hope to the hearts of us wretched mortals as we strive to do our best every day, that we may be ever so slightly closer to that shining summit he chases! To the Mountain! To the Wilderness! TO THE FUTURE!
+12 link
acorncap
acorncap
Posts: 30

6/29/2017
I think the meta-complaints have more to do with how forceful you've been with your truth pamphlets. Sending them out to Feducci supporters, posting frequently in Feducci threads. Your enthusiasm is to be commended, but it can come across as very pushy, or stressful, especially when it's the same long post multiple times.

You're absolutely within your rights to make this thread- it's the constant repetition of the same long post in multiple threads that has people at arms. It's a fun read, and it adds flavor to the campaign, but not when it's the fourth time in the fourth thread in one day.

--
Dr. Adelaide Capella - The Steadfast Doctor - Also a Watchful Patron
+10 link
Conrad Baltar
Conrad Baltar
Posts: 42

6/29/2017
An open response to Lady Anne Auclair's letter campaign titled "The Truth About Feducci". I apologise for the incoming lengthy reply but your points about my candidate have been circling around my mind all day, and I feel I have no choice but to respond. There are spoilers below, but unfortunately I cannot spoiler tag and quote, so use your discretion.

I also apologise for any offence in the following post, I realise that I may have gotten a bit passionate in my defence of my candidate.

Anne Auclair wrote:
Feducci is a false-Tomb Colonist, an invincible immortal man wrapped in stolen bandages who feigns a limp and a cough. He presents himself in such a way so he can lure people into his private fighting club and slaughter them in a duel to the permanent death.


This first point feels misleading. Feducci does not approach people to join the Black Ribbon until they have proven themselves victorious in his three fighting rings. (Now, the fact that the man runs three illegal fighting rings, that I can see as a point of contention and a problem. Of course, I’m sure that Feducci would shut them all down immediately upon becoming Mayor). People interested in joining the Black Ribbon are given every opportunity to reject the offer. Feducci is, repeatedly, very clear on the terms. He does not “lure them” as you so gently put it, but offers an informed choice.

Anne Auclair wrote:
Duels to the death where the reigning champion cannot possibly be harmed, let alone killed, are hardly fair by any definition of the word. And of course Feducci is not content the advantages granted by his invincibility, he also goes to his duels proudly astride a warhorse in order to face opponents who fight on foot.


I agree with you that the reigning champion being unable to die a true death himself is indeed unfair. However, the Black Ribbon as a whole tends to lean towards uneven fights. Mr Inch does not fight himself, but uses his menagerie of creatures. Colonel Pomeroy keeps a rifle hidden on the duelling grounds in case he gets disarmed. And to break character, the player character themselves traps the palace grounds to duel Chi Lan (references available on request, I did not wish to blot out the ceiling with too many links and too much text).

The only rule of the Black Ribbon is to the death. Being prepared for eventualities such as hidden weapons, or the use of an animal are just the price people pay for duelling in the Black Ribbon.

Anne Auclair wrote:
Feducci has had so many of these dishonest duels and has slaughtered so many unsuspecting opponents that he goes into battle with his arms wrapped in black ribbons


It is my opinion that if an opponent has gone through the entire Black Ribbon (a requirement to face Feducci), and not discovered that Feducci is a duelist beyond compare, then that is less unsuspecting and more wilfully blind.

Anne Auclair wrote:
(2) When not permanently killing lesser mortals for sport, Feducci serves as the Presbyters Agent in London. Feducci’s clandestine activities are whispered about in the Flit and is regularly seen delivering reports and relics to Presbyter zailors.


Fair points, slightly heavily made, but not disagreeable.

Anne Auclair wrote:
But the strongest testimony comes from one of his former associates in Venderbight’s Grand Sanatorium, which was uncovered by a gentleman seeking his Nemeses:

http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/ShowMore/434443/EventConclusion?contentKey=15023

Now here is what I find unbelievable. Whilst I have not had the opportunity to visit the Grand Sanatorium as it does not host the Vake (at least as far as I am aware), I have found a rough description of it’s purpose. (Spoilers for the purpose of the Sanatorium below,
the Grand Sanatorium, where they bring the tomb-colonists too far gone to walk or think or speak. The place is something between an insane asylum and a crypt. Niches filled with groaning or shrieking or meditative tomb-colonists fill every corridor. There are a great many corridors.

I mean no offence with this statement but I'm not going to take the word of a dying, potentially insane patient as a solid fact that Feducci is the Presbyter’s “spymaster”. One person’s testimony, especially with the above caveats, should not be enough to condemn him.

Anne Auclair wrote:
Feducci, in his capacity as the Presbyter’s Agent in London, regularly commissions the murder of London citizens, particularly those whose existence is condemned by Holy Presbyterate Law.

http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/ShowMore/7099710/EventConclusion?contentKey=13494


London citizens? I’m afraid we must be of different mind on what makes one a citizen of London. If by citizens you mean if by citizens you mean “people” (and I use that word sparingly to refer to those beasts) who commit murder and identity theft on a semi-regular basis, then yes the Snuffers are citizens. However, I will point out that Feducci is not the only one to pay for snuffers. Our very own Department of Menace Eradication puts out a bounty for them.

Anne Auclair wrote:
As the recent election campaign has established, Feducci is being paid by the Presbyter for these services. These payments are laundered through under-zee commercial transactions. Feducci invests in a speculative venture that a London company is hoping to make with the government controlled Licensed Exchange at Adam’s Way. The Presbyterate government then agrees to and insures that this venture is profitable. There was never any possibility of Feducci losing his investment.


These payments are only recently coming through and being made. Yes, they may prove that Feducci is performing insider trading, but that in itself is not proof of payment from a foreign power. That’s just proof of business dealings.

_____

Anne Auclair wrote:
(3) Just as he has clothed himself in an aura of unearned courage, fighting duels that cannot possibly hurt him, Feducci has cultivated a reputation as a winner by repeatedly gambling with loaded dice. And yet this man promises to even the odds in London?


The duels can, and do, hurt him. Unless you think the linked does not hurt?
John Moose addresses the last part of this segment better than I could after 3 hours of serious thought, and all credit to him. However, it is your closing remark I wish to comment on.

Anne Auclair wrote:
So ask yourself, would a false gambler like Feducci wager on the odds he has given you – that electing a cheater and schemer would somehow make London a fairer place? We both know the answer to that.

Some may view what he does as cheating and scheming. Others may view it as pragmatism or planning ahead and ensuring victory at any cost. That is a matter of perspective. And that matter of perspective is what draws the line between those of us willing to support him, and those of us who oppose him.
edited by Conrad Baltar on 6/29/2017

--
Conrad Baltar is open to all social invites when in London.

A proud Feducci Campaigner. "Fair Play, Fair Game, Fair London."

"Some may view what Feducci does as cheating and scheming. Others may view it as pragmatism or planning ahead and ensuring victory at any cost. That is a matter of perspective. And that matter of perspective is what draws the line between those of us willing to support him, and those of us who oppose him."

To all Feducci supporters, please let me know (via private messaging or in the main Feducci thread) if you require any Wounds or Nightmares reduction, I'll do my best to assist you over the rest of the week.


http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Conrad%20Baltar
+9 link
Plynkes
Plynkes
Posts: 631

6/29/2017
Indeed, wasn't this already posted in another thread? Are you going to repost every clever remark you make in its own thread, to make absolutely certain no-one in Fallen London misses it?

It's gonna get a little spammy around here if everyone starts doing that.

--
"Then tell Wind and Fire where to stop, but don't tell me."
+8 link
Kukapetal
Kukapetal
Posts: 1449

6/29/2017
Found a new target, did you? :P

Anyway, I've never found Feducci's duels unfair. He dies the same as everyone else so he's not actually unfairly advantaged during the actual duel. He just comes back later. But if you kill him, you're still considered the winner of the duel. He doesn't get up and come after you immediately like he's the Terminator :P

I agree it's hypocritical and cowardly that he isn't actually risking what he asks everyone else in his society to risk, but it doesn't give him unfair advantage or put anyone who duels him at greater risk.

Still not voting for him though :P
+8 link
Plynkes
Plynkes
Posts: 631

6/29/2017
I don't think anyone is saying you're not within your rights, Anne.

But you'd think temperance campaigners of all people might recognize the value of moderation.

--
"Then tell Wind and Fire where to stop, but don't tell me."
+7 link
Tystefy
Tystefy
Posts: 450

6/29/2017
It's kind of hard to take all this seriously when everytime I read "Feducci" I read it as "Feduchini".

--
Will sometimes return to post absurdity.
+7 link
Diptych
Diptych
Administrator
Posts: 3493

6/30/2017
I. WILL. TURN. THIS. FORUM. AROUND. NO. ELECTION. FOR. ANYBODY.

--
Sir Frederick, the Libertarian Esotericist. Lord Hubris, the Bloody Baron.
Juniper Brown, the Ill-Fated Orphan. Esther Ellis-Hall, the Fashionable Fabian.
+7 link
dov
dov
Posts: 2580

6/30/2017
Sir Joseph Marlen wrote:
Gul al-Ahlaam wrote:
Have you ever dueled Feducci? When you kill him, even though the death isn't permanent, he gives you the win anyway! So long as you inflict what would on an ordinary man be the permanent death, he awards you the victory and graciously accepts defeat! That's the opposite of cheating.

The problem is that he isn't risking the same thing as the other duelists. He's immortal dealing in a game that involves permanent death of the challenger. The only reason the other duels in the game aren't permanent is because of wacky circumstances in the way of writing, save for the ironically only actual permadeath in the duels.

Not fully.

If you challenge Feducci (your choice, BTW) and lose, do you die the permanent death? Are there wacky circumstances saving you? No. He kills you, you go to the boat, and then you come back.

You give it your best shot to try and kill him. He gives it goes best shot to try to kill you. Neither of you die the permanent death. And if you do enough damage to him, he declares you the winner.

I don't support Feducci in this campaign, but the duels with him are as fair as they can be.

(Also, if you challenge Chi-Lan, you only "win" by leading her to a trap, or tricking her, since she's a much better duelist than you. That's more dishonest than anything Feducci does in a fight)

--
Want a sip of Hesperidean Cider? Send me a request in-game. Here's an_ocelot's guide how.
(Most social actions are welcome. Please no requests to Loiter Suspiciously and no investigations of the Affluent Photographer)
+5 link
Vavakx Nonexus
Vavakx Nonexus
Posts: 892

6/30/2017
Anne Auclair wrote:
Hattington wrote:
[
...excuse me, am I blind or do the words "has no idea what to do with it all" indicate a marked lack of destruction? Unless you're implying she's in cahoots with Mr. Eaten (and damning her by...whatever aiding and abetting Mr. Eaten is called, association seems a bit strong), what I'm seeing is putting it somewhere it can be extracted later.

I have my doubts the Iron Republic. Can't do the linking thing, but trading brandy with the Infernal Sommelier has him point out they never rebelled agains the Judgements SPECIFICALLY. So I'm not convinced the association with the Anarchists isn't simply a business relationship they're expecting to not achieve it's slated goal; yes I've witnessed the transaction where Hell was commisioned to smelt a new Law and i've also seen the inscription that implies the Fingerkings are allied with Hell to some extent. But what clinches it for me is-Hell ultimately WANTS (the transaction of) souls, in the sense they see value in them. As souls are star-spores, it stands to reason they can't entirely agree with the forces that would see them as either potential enemies (I'm pretty sure Lost in Reflections has allusions to Parabola rotting lights with reference to souls), or one more link in the Chain to be broken.

Also, I just plain don't like tea.

EDIT: Actually, I just noticed you yourself put it better than I could have: "Oh dear, this could go very well or very badly."

edited by Hattington on 6/30/2017


The DTC is not "stockpiling honey" in contradiction of her platform, she is trying to dispose of it. So you simply got that wrong.

As for Hell's Republic, even if their deals with the Revolutionaries are ultimately insincere, they are still making deals with the Calendar Council, providing them supplies, helping them build weapons, and sponsoring them with a safe haven in which to test out their ideas of a law free world. Hell and Feducci are therefore pretty deep into the Liberation of the Night, way deeper then someone who just happens to have a few casual Revolutionary friends.

Of course most players have a few casual Revolutionary friends...so the DTC's sin in that regard is no worse then the player with a few a Revolutionary Connected points and no "plotting against the Masters." But Feducci is allied with Hell and Hell supports the Liberation...so Feducci probably has a pretty high "advancing Liberation of the Night" quality.
edited by Anne Auclair on 6/30/2017


I would avoid being particularly active in these discussions, but a BLATANT MISUNDERSTANDING OF EVERY FACTION'S CHAIN RHETORIC is too far.

First of all,
As for Hell's Republic, even if their deals with the Revolutionaries are ultimately insincere, they are still making deals with the Calendar Council, providing them supplies, helping them build weapons, and sponsoring them with a safe haven in which to test out their ideas of a law free world.

I will need a source for these mysterious deals. The only thing Hell does with the Iron Republic is mess up laws and let every old fool who wants to be there be there.

The Iron Republic ISN'T EVEN CLOSE TO A LAW-FREE HAVEN. It's chock-full with laws!
Iron Republic's Port Description in Sunless Sea wrote:
Hell's client-state. Be wary. Their laws are not the laws of Man or Nature.

We know how the Liberation of Night actually looks and works from its respective Destiny.
The Lights Are Out wrote:
All of them. All at once, when the Device was set in motion. Candles, gas-lamps, oil-flares - the false-stars of the roof, the fungus-glimmers of the marshes. All gone. On the skin of the Bazaar, faint traces of fire fitfully shudder and crawl. They shed a feeble, feeble light for moments only. You can barely see. And you can barely hear, for the screaming.

And how does the Iron Republic look?
Iron Republic's Location Description in Sunless Sea wrote:
Factory-engines roar like false lions. Blood thunders in the dock-pipes. Crimson lightning skitters across the deck, leaps to the rail, coils there like a cat. The city is reflected in glassy-calm harbour water: the citizens there have the heads of dogs and serpents.

Parting with the Crotchety Tobacconist wrote:
The Crotchety Tobacconist strides off your deck while glaring upward into the crimson lights of the Iron Republic

The Republic is far from lightless, and it repeatedly shown and stated to be covered in Red Light. And light, as we know, is a sign of Law and its presence in some form.

The Republic is merely a testing ground for Hell and its creation of New Laws, and most devils treat it exactly like that.
Obtain an Iron Republic Safe-Conduct wrote:
'You want to head to the Iron Republic? Why? Really - what can be worth that? Even my kind don't relish a visit. Well, it's your money. And don't think that this will save you.

Open the gate (Renown: Hell 40 item) wrote:
But I do recall flashes of memory: a place not of tormenting, but fermenting? A place where experiments are made to appease the Law. Nothing more comes to me.

Investigating the 12/15 to Moloch Street item wrote:
What was purchased: the casting of a new law in the factories of Hell.

Appeasing the law and making even more new ones? That does not sound even close to the revolutionary ideas of snuffing out all the lights and living in total freedom from all law forever to me.

Any revolutionaries acting out of the Republic are only unsupervised visitors. Hell itself never does anything to support them in the Republic.
Sell the Memento Mori to a purchaser in the Iron Republic wrote:
The Iron Republic has no government, no representatives. But it has plenty of citizens eager to purchase an engine of destruction.


Now, for Feducci and what other movements he mirrors.

When it comes to chain rhetoric, the verb they use is of extreme importance:
The LoN Destiny and those Revolutionaries in support of it emphasize breaking the Chain altogether, and are referred to as anarchistic.
Fear walks the streets of London wrote:
The Calendar Council, that master-cell of anarchists, is on the rise: and they have you to thank for it.

The Seven Against Nidah and the Mountain Destiny, on the other hand, emphasize ascending the Chain, and are referred to as democratizing death.
Ambition: Death Hath no more Dominion wrote:
It is said that seven once tried to democratise death.

The way that both Feducci and Hell's Season of Revolutions he participated in are both framed demonstrably closer to the less destructive rhetoric of the Seven and the democratization of immortality.
Feducci's introduction wrote:
Promises of a chain that can be climbed has sparked hope in London’s poor. Jet and crimson banners herald Feducci’s arrival.

A layout of committee design (Five Minutes to Midday) wrote:
...the display on the Season of Revolutions, celebrating when the devils overthrew the infernal nobility and Hell became a republic.


So, no. Feducci does not have a lot of Advancing the LoN.

--
Amets Estibariz, the Moulting Eidolon: Cradled by a sun all their own.


Blabbing, the Hobo Everyone Knows: The One Who Pulls The Strings. A Clarity In The Darkness.


Charlotte and the Caretaker: A family?
+5 link
Hattington
Hattington
Posts: 210

6/30/2017
Anne Auclair wrote:
(1) Feducci makes grand promises to bring about a fairer London, but his character and past actions cast grave doubts as to whether he actually believes what he says.

Feducci is a false-Tomb Colonist, an invincible immortal man wrapped in stolen bandages who feigns a limp and a cough. He presents himself in such a way so he can lure people into his private fighting club and slaughter them in a duel to the permanent death. Duels to the death where the reigning champion cannot possibly be harmed, let alone killed, are hardly fair by any definition of the word. And of course Feducci is not content the advantages granted by his invincibility, he also goes to his duels proudly astride a warhorse in order to face opponents who fight on foot.

Feducci has had so many of these dishonest duels and has slaughtered so many unsuspecting opponents that he goes into battle with his arms wrapped in black ribbons:

“If that were not bad enough, his arms are swathed in enough black ribbons to hide his bandages. There are dozens of them: how many of his own society has he killed?”

Each of those ribbons taken from a man or woman who Feducci permanently murdered in an unfair, thoroughly one-sided duel.

___

(2) When not permanently killing lesser mortals for sport, Feducci serves as the Presbyters Agent in London. Feducci’s clandestine activities are whispered about in the Flit and is regularly seen delivering reports and relics to Presbyter zailors. But the strongest testimony comes from one of his former associates in Venderbight’s Grand Sanatorium, which was uncovered by a gentleman seeking his Nemeses:

http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/ShowMore/434443/EventConclusion?contentKey=15023

Feducci, in his capacity as the Presbyter’s Agent in London, regularly commissions the murder of London citizens, particularly those whose existence is condemned by Holy Presbyterate Law.

http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/ShowMore/7099710/EventConclusion?contentKey=13494

As the recent election campaign has established, Feducci is being paid by the Presbyter for these services. These payments are laundered through under-zee commercial transactions. Feducci invests in a speculative venture that a London company is hoping to make with the government controlled Licensed Exchange at Adam’s Way. The Presbyterate government then agrees to and insures that this venture is profitable. There was never any possibility of Feducci losing his investment.

_____

(3) Just as he has clothed himself in an aura of unearned courage, fighting duels that cannot possibly hurt him, Feducci has cultivated a reputation as a winner by repeatedly gambling with loaded dice. And yet this man promises to even the odds in London?

The Presbyter is getting something for all this money – that is obvious. If Feducci becomes Mayor he will be indebted for his success to an unfriendly foreign power that lays claim to territories held by London!

Lastly, Feducci has a terrible record when it comes to the people who put their trust in him. We’ve already documented how he treats his fellow duelists in the Black Ribbon – as pawns and disposable amusements! But this goes back a long way. When he still resided on the Elder Continent, Feducci went on a pilgrimage to the brambled city of Arbour:

“Feducci was a celebrated figure, attended by lovers, well-wishers and flatterers. Many begged to accompany him, and a company of seventy-seven embarked with pennants, wine, and song.

…One by one, Feducci's companions fell, but he refused to turn back. When he reached the rosebrick gate, he was alone.”

So ask yourself, would a false gambler like Feducci wager on the odds he has given you – that electing a cheater and schemer would somehow make London a fairer place? We both know the answer to that.



  • ...here's what I don't get about people complaining about Feducci: Have you SEEN the opposition?! And for goodness' sake-when has London EVER been "fair"? Even good ol' Jenny had to makea few compromises with the Masters to pay for all those dockworker/bohemian/urchin education programs!

    In one corner, we have an allegedly prim and proper society dame who's secretly stockpiling massive amounts of honey instead of destroying it like the chaste platform she professes to support, privately admits in a list of potential allies to being willing to compromise on a great many of her principles and has former associations with Revolutionaries. Who, we've established, are ultimately the pawns of a very eldritch black sun for all their claptrap about fighting the Judgements. Remember what happened last year when the Bishop was running for Mayor? You NEVER bring personal things that can be compromised into the political arena, and expect to come out smelling like, hah, roses.

    In the OTHER corner, we have a detective who wants to enact a Grand Prosecution upon London's legal system. This is, realistically speaking, doomed when said system is a farce managed by a giant crab and space bats. More worryingly, there are accounts of her being enough of a sore loser to stoop to FIngerking associate assistence to win a case. And it's also concerning that she seems to have very little to say on domestic policy outside of wanting to reform and investigate everything; considering what a low opinion much of London's populace has for the constables, I somehow don't see their most down-on-their-luck members being given a second chance ending optimistically.

    So we've either got two hypocrites, or one hypocrite and one doomed knight templar whose proclitivies respectively make their rhetoric seem empty or worryingly ominous. And again-supporting either is tacitly supporting either REALITY TERRORISTS, or MIND EATING DREAM SNAKES.

    Now, I'll put aside the fact Feducci's very real financial strategising, contacts in the Presbyterate and Devillish associates (they have vacuum cleaner! WE NEED THOSE!) because from your point of view those are all downsides. Yes, I am making the case Hell is the lesser evil here considering taking souls doesn't result in incendiary property damage or possesion by snakes. He's an untrustworthy villain, I get that. But at least he has ambition, dammit; if I can't find a candidate I can believe in this year, I'll damn well settle for backing a candidate whose villainy has flair.

    And one last thing: I judge my candidates a lot by how they operate under crisis, because let's face it-London is one long, eldritch crisis with some very pretty facades thrown over it. The Detective? Got somewhat shaken from her high horse from one irate heckler. The Temperance Campaigner? Either her or one of her associates freaked out hard when I found the aforementioned documents concerning compromise. Feducci? He's a damn good sport.

    I fully expect whichever candidate gets chosen to disappoint us all, somewhere down the lane. I'm simply siding with the one who seems like he'll provide the best honeymoon period, do the least harm in office and be the most graceful loser.

  • edited by Hattington on 6/30/2017

    --
    The Dawnburnt Vake-Rider: https://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Hattington
  • +4 link
    Teaspoon
    Teaspoon
    Posts: 866

    6/30/2017
    There's a Mayoral card for the year: hapless idiots in Wolfstack keep impaling themselves on Feducci's sword/hat-stand/pointy-'eaded-stick.

    You get a Tomb Colonist favour from all the bandaged coming by to laugh at how stupid that death was.
    edited by Teaspoon on 6/30/2017

    --
    Truth lies at the bottom of a well.

    https://www.fallenlondon.com/profile/Alt%20Ern
    +4 link
    dov
    dov
    Posts: 2580

    6/30/2017
    Hattington wrote:
    Isaac Zienfried wrote:
    To be fair, the Campaigner isn't the one playing dirty. Some of us on the campaign have taken on that burden so the lady can keep her hands clean.

    If that's an incentive to vote against her on general principle, it's succeeding magnificently.

    I... Have to agree with that.

    [snip]

    Just based on the inflammatory rhethoric on the forum, I'm skipping most posts having to do with her.

    ----
    edited by dov on 7/5/2017

    --
    Want a sip of Hesperidean Cider? Send me a request in-game. Here's an_ocelot's guide how.
    (Most social actions are welcome. Please no requests to Loiter Suspiciously and no investigations of the Affluent Photographer)
    +4 link
    Sir Joseph Marlen
    Sir Joseph Marlen
    Posts: 575

    6/29/2017
    John Moose wrote:
    The duels are fair. At no point does Feducci deny where he's from, and he even hints at not being in the habit of dying easily by disguising himself as a Tomb-Colonist. Besides, he can be killed. Best him in combat, hack him into pieces, sink all those pieces in the zee and let the beasts feast on him. He's not coming back. It's hardly his fault if no one ever takes him seriously. More to the point, a person who thinks it'll be fun to join a duelling society and challenges the leader - a long time leader of a duelling society, if you'll allow a moment for that to sink in - and doesn't expect the leader to have a contingency plan against getting stabbed in the gut is an idiot and the world is better off without them. Crying about an unfair fight to the true death just shows everyone you didn't realise just how balls-deep you were in your dangerous hobbies.

    I think you're missing the point. Just because Feducci is a badass that can return from the dead doesn't change that it's not a fair fight. This is a fight to the permanent death, and Feducci never makes it a point to explain just how damnably hard it is to end him. Average people wouldn't assume you're a nearly-immortal Presbyterate spy. Yes, it'd be foolish to think the leader of a murder club would be playing on the same level as us, but just because he's able to convince fools doesn't make his hidden advantages any less wrong or unfair. Also, hinting at a hidden truth is not the same as it being an openly known fact.
    John Moose wrote:
    On the second point: London citizens? London citizens? We are talking about the same serial-killing face-stealing monsters here, aren't we? Feducci kills killers that have agreed to a deathmatch, a Snuffer kills whoever's convenient. That Snuffer you really like? The one who you think is a decent fellow, really? Jump on a boat and ask what the face's former owner, or their family, think of the matter. Snuffers will kill people as a fox kills chickens and there's no point to wallow about it endlessly, such is nature's way - but they are not citizens any more than a particularly big and mean sewer rat is, and no Londoner who cares about their fellow humans will be able to keep a straight face while condemning their eradication.
    Who are we to judge people who are the victims of a holy war's genocide simply for their association with their monstrous creator? Many Snuffers are horrid killers that don't care who they steal from. The same could be said for the ruthless murderers and abusers among London's human populous. Snuffers vary just as much as humans; some kill randomly, some kill out of fear or survival, some hate their condition and wish to be something different. By your logic, any creature associated with a potential threat is free game. Why not skewer the Rubberies for the potential destruction their deep sea cousins and connections may cause? Pentecost Apes can just be exterminated like pests, regardless of how much they claim to have something akin to humanity in them. And now that I think about it, just how human are some of those Urchin children in the Flit? If there are any more like the one from Sunless Sea's urchin backstory, their very existence is a threat to future zee captains.
    edited by Sir Joseph Marlen on 6/29/2017

    --
    Sir Joseph Marlen - The Romantic Sophist
    Alexus Harven - The Defiant Fatalist
    Rose Reinhelm - The Respectful Revolutionary
    Cappuccino - The Perfidious Spycraft


    Available for any and all social actions.
    +3 link
    Conrad Baltar
    Conrad Baltar
    Posts: 42

    6/29/2017
    Lady Auclair, if I were to post a response to your so-called "Truth", where would you prefer I post it? Here, in the Honey Well or in the general Feducci thread?

    --
    Conrad Baltar is open to all social invites when in London.

    A proud Feducci Campaigner. "Fair Play, Fair Game, Fair London."

    "Some may view what Feducci does as cheating and scheming. Others may view it as pragmatism or planning ahead and ensuring victory at any cost. That is a matter of perspective. And that matter of perspective is what draws the line between those of us willing to support him, and those of us who oppose him."

    To all Feducci supporters, please let me know (via private messaging or in the main Feducci thread) if you require any Wounds or Nightmares reduction, I'll do my best to assist you over the rest of the week.


    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Conrad%20Baltar
    +3 link
    Anne Auclair
    Anne Auclair
    Posts: 2215

    6/29/2017
    Drake Dynamo wrote:
    Maybe you could, I don't know, just chill out?

    Oh, I am very chill ^_^ Chill and competitive.

    --
    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Anne%20Auclair
    +2 link
    Anne Auclair
    Anne Auclair
    Posts: 2215

    6/29/2017
    Drake Dynamo wrote:
    Anne Auclair wrote:
    Drake Dynamo wrote:
    Maybe you could, I don't know, just chill out?

    Oh, I am very chill ^_^ Chill and competitive.

    I mean, the all-caps Info-Wars-esque title of this thread suggests otherwise.

    Someone has never read a 19th century pamphlet. They were big on the melodrama.

    Also, the information contained within is 100% true, so the title is completely accurate.

    --
    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Anne%20Auclair
    +2 link
    Optimatum
    Optimatum
    Posts: 3666

    6/30/2017
    Hattington wrote:
    In one corner, we have an allegedly prim and proper society dame who's secretly stockpiling massive amounts of honey instead of destroying it like the chaste platform she professes to support, privately admits in a list of potential allies to being willing to compromise on a great many of her principles and has former associations with Revolutionaries. Who, we've established, are ultimately the pawns of a very eldritch black sun for all their claptrap about fighting the Judgements. Remember what happened last year when the Bishop was running for Mayor? You NEVER bring personal things that can be compromised into the political arena, and expect to come out smelling like, hah, roses.



    A few things...
    • How can you actually destroy honey? (Serious question.) Given the more unusual properties of Prisoner's Honey I doubt there are many safe ways.
    • In politics, willingness to compromise on less important goals to accomplish something is a good trait. Insisting on idealogical purity and no compromise is often a great way to get none of what you want.
    • Iirc her only association with Revolutionaries was being friends with the now-dead March, who - outside the very few in the know - presented as a typical upper-class person. In fact, if you tell the DTC at Hallowmas that he was murdered by the Calendar Council, she vows to begin a campaign against the Council. That doesn't sound like Revolutionary support to me.


    --
    Optimatum, a ruthless and merciful gentleman. No plant battles, Affluent Photographer requests, or healing offers; all other social actions welcome.

    Want a sip of Cider? Just say hi!

    PM me for information enigmatic or Fated. Though the forum please, not FL itself.
    +2 link
    Sir Joseph Marlen
    Sir Joseph Marlen
    Posts: 575

    6/30/2017
    Gul al-Ahlaam wrote:
    I think you're missing the point. Just because Feducci is a badass that can return from the dead doesn't change that it's not a fair fight. This is a fight to the permanent death, and Feducci never makes it a point to explain just how damnably hard it is to end him.

  • Have you ever dueled Feducci? When you kill him, even though the death isn't permanent, he gives you the win anyway! So long as you inflict what would on an ordinary man be the permanent death, he awards you the victory and graciously accepts defeat! That's the opposite of cheating.

  • The problem is that he isn't risking the same thing as the other duelists. He's immortal dealing in a game that involves permanent death of the challenger. The only reason the other duels in the game aren't permanent is because of wacky circumstances in the way of writing, save for the ironically only actual permadeath in the duels. With Feducci, it's not circumstance that prevents his death, it's the fact that he cannot die (well, unless the Presbyterate wills it). Sure, he pays you after the duel, but that doesn't change that he's playing a wager in which he isn't at risk. The gamble of the battle is one-sided, and many people in-lore don't know what they're getting into.

    --
    Sir Joseph Marlen - The Romantic Sophist
    Alexus Harven - The Defiant Fatalist
    Rose Reinhelm - The Respectful Revolutionary
    Cappuccino - The Perfidious Spycraft


    Available for any and all social actions.
    +2 link
    Anne Auclair
    Anne Auclair
    Posts: 2215

    6/30/2017
    Conrad Baltar wrote:
    Anne Auclair wrote:
    As the recent election campaign has established, Feducci is being paid by the Presbyter for these services. These payments are laundered through under-zee commercial transactions. Feducci invests in a speculative venture that a London company is hoping to make with the government controlled Licensed Exchange at Adam’s Way. The Presbyterate government then agrees to and insures that this venture is profitable. There was never any possibility of Feducci losing his investment.


    These payments are only recently coming through and being made. Yes, they may prove that Feducci is performing insider trading, but that in itself is not proof of payment from a foreign power. That’s just proof of business dealings.

    Feducci and the Presbyterate aren't engaged in insider trading, they're engaged in a form of money laundering.

    The Presbyter needs to pay Feducci for his services and provide him with a budget for operations (assassinating London Snuffers, for example). But the Presbyterate Embassy can't just hand Feducci a big bag of money every few months - that would raise questions and bring unwelcome attention. So Feducci invests in a London commercial venture to the Elder Continent and communicates this to his superiors. All commerce between London and the Elder Continent is conducted through the licensed businesses of Adam's Way, so the Presbyterate government has a lot of control over commercial outcomes. When Feducci is involved the Presbyterate makes sure that the venture is very profitable, so Feducci gets a big return on his investment. Feducci then gets his pay and his intelligence budget in the form of a nice, clean cash flow from successful "speculations."

    --
    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Anne%20Auclair
    +2 link
    Isaac Zienfried
    Isaac Zienfried
    Posts: 364

    6/30/2017
    To be fair, transporting that much cargo upwards would be extremely expensive in terms of fuel and supplies. The trip down is always easier than up, meaning imports are probably more numerous. London likely acts on a severe trade deficit with the Surface... that, or its exports are far more valuable by weight. Secrets, jewels, etc.

    --
    Isaac Zienfried, 'The Vacillating Belligerent.'
    A gentleman of complicated loyalties, complicated morality, and complicated goals.
    But really, it's hard to keep things simple down here!
    +2 link
    Conrad Baltar
    Conrad Baltar
    Posts: 42

    6/30/2017
    Isaac Zienfried wrote:
    To be fair, transporting that much cargo upwards would be extremely expensive in terms of fuel and supplies. The trip down is always easier than up, meaning imports are probably more numerous. London likely acts on a severe trade deficit with the Surface... that, or its exports are far more valuable by weight. Secrets, jewels, etc.
    That is a very good point. Perhaps send it in smaller quantities across many ships?

    I am mainly just pointing out that the option exists to dispose of the honey in a way that is not leaving it to crystallise or mulch somewhere.

    --
    Conrad Baltar is open to all social invites when in London.

    A proud Feducci Campaigner. "Fair Play, Fair Game, Fair London."

    "Some may view what Feducci does as cheating and scheming. Others may view it as pragmatism or planning ahead and ensuring victory at any cost. That is a matter of perspective. And that matter of perspective is what draws the line between those of us willing to support him, and those of us who oppose him."

    To all Feducci supporters, please let me know (via private messaging or in the main Feducci thread) if you require any Wounds or Nightmares reduction, I'll do my best to assist you over the rest of the week.


    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Conrad%20Baltar
    +2 link
    Conrad Baltar
    Conrad Baltar
    Posts: 42

    6/30/2017
    Optimatum wrote:


    • How can you actually destroy honey? (Serious question.) Given the more unusual properties of Prisoner's Honey I doubt there are many safe ways.



    Reference is made somewhere that once prisoners honey gets sent to the Surface, it loses it's more Neathy qualities and becomes just honey. But for the life of me, I can't remember if that was Fallen London or Sunless Sea.

    If the above is true, then surely that would be better for the DTC. Ship it up the Cumean Canal to Naples, trade it to merchants, use the funds for their campaign. Yes that does mean they profit off honey, but it means that 1) there is less honey in London and 2) it is no longer performing it's intended purpose.

    --
    Conrad Baltar is open to all social invites when in London.

    A proud Feducci Campaigner. "Fair Play, Fair Game, Fair London."

    "Some may view what Feducci does as cheating and scheming. Others may view it as pragmatism or planning ahead and ensuring victory at any cost. That is a matter of perspective. And that matter of perspective is what draws the line between those of us willing to support him, and those of us who oppose him."

    To all Feducci supporters, please let me know (via private messaging or in the main Feducci thread) if you require any Wounds or Nightmares reduction, I'll do my best to assist you over the rest of the week.


    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Conrad%20Baltar
    +2 link
    Gul al-Ahlaam
    Gul al-Ahlaam
    Posts: 225

    6/30/2017
    So, there's been a lot of concern about Feducci's role as a spy for the Presbyterate, and what ulterior motive he might hold in running his campaign as he does. I've got a fresh new take on it you might appreciate: I don't think he has any ulterior motive at all, or at least not one that will matter to us.
    First, and someone's got to say it, he's not very good at being a spy. He reveals the skin beneath his bandages while he eats, often forgets to keep his limp or his false voice up, openly interacts with Presbyterate traders and officials on the docks, and, most damningly of all, basically reveals his nature to any well-read Black Ribbon duelist who challenges him simply by returning from the dead. Plus, his main rival, the Devout Intriguer, knows far more about his movements than she reasonably ought to. And so do we!
    And this is fine, for the role he plays. He's not a spy by profession, he's a celebrity duelist and monster hunter. The Prester placed him in London so he could keep an eye on things for her, and she hasn't called on him to do much of anything but watch the snuffers and occasionally kill a particularly dangerous one.
    Now, becoming the mayor isn't going to give him any more power than he's already got, not really. It's an executive role he'll hold for one year. The Masters make the laws, run the Face and the Teeth, and decide how the economy runs. The military is basically defunct. What could he be able do in a year where he's under constant scrutiny that he couldn't do before?
    Personally, I think his positions are sincerely held. He's from the Presbyterate, where drive and personal success seem pretty important, and he fought in the war against the old kings of Hell ostensibly for personal reasons, whether that was adventure in general or freedom-fighting in particular.
    Clearly he's running for his own entertainment primarily, and having a lot of fun doing it. But I believe he decided to run on his own, or at the very least created his platform himself, based on an earnest desire to make people's lives more interesting and more free.


  • --
    The Uncanny Hierophant.
    The Jewel-Eyed Prince.
  • +2 link
    Hattington
    Hattington
    Posts: 210

    6/30/2017
    Isaac Zienfried wrote:
    Hattington wrote:
    At least with Feducci's campaign, the monsters will probably be as shaken up as everyone else.

    And the greatest monsters of all? The Masters? Feducci himself said little, if anything, will be done about them. For a man so willing to fight, I find it odd he isn't the one who's most firmly set themselves against them.
    Perhaps he's afraid of a fight he can't simply pick himself up and walk away from...
    edited by Isaac Zienfried on 6/30/2017


    Oh come on. One? Now you're just being unrealistic. I don't see either of the other candidates declaring their 5-step space bat assassination program either when they're at the root of the corruption and crime in this city.

    And two? The Vake is MY quarry.



  • --
    The Dawnburnt Vake-Rider: https://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Hattington
  • +2 link
    Optimatum
    Optimatum
    Posts: 3666

    6/30/2017
    Hattington wrote:
    ...I'm sorry, are you implying Prisoner's Honey is somehow indestructible by conventional means? Burn it (I'm positive this was actually referenced along with burning vellum when tracking down last season's exceptional story). Dump it in the sea (it's not like the marine life isn't already affected by worse influence). Throw it in a big hole where nothing can touch it, rather than stockpiling it.

    I'm implying that I'm not sure what methods of destruction are effective against honey in general, not just the Prisoner's variety. I meant that while I'm sure Prisoner's Honey is perfectly destructible, the methods of doing so may cause nasty side-effects. And isn't dumping it all in a well the same thing as "throw it in a big hole where nothing can touch it"? (I haven't actually yet seen the option in-game where this is referenced, just read descriptions of it on here, so if someone could link it that would be great.)
    Though I remember she also commented in a way that made it seem like she blamed Wines instead. I'll keep my eyes peeled for how she responds to the Revolutionaries' overture, but combining a willingness to compromise and an ostensible appeal to conservative morality doesn't inspire confidence in me.

    The way I read it, she had blamed Wines for March's death before learning it was really the work of the Calendar Council. Also, conservative morality? The temperance movement in Britain was apparently involved with women's suffrage, helping women and children, and preventing animal cruelty. Quite a bit different than the American version.

    --
    Optimatum, a ruthless and merciful gentleman. No plant battles, Affluent Photographer requests, or healing offers; all other social actions welcome.

    Want a sip of Cider? Just say hi!

    PM me for information enigmatic or Fated. Though the forum please, not FL itself.
    +2 link
    Hattington
    Hattington
    Posts: 210

    6/30/2017
    Anne Auclair wrote:
    Hattington wrote:
    [
  • ...excuse me, am I blind or do the words "has no idea what to do with it all" indicate a marked lack of destruction? Unless you're implying she's in cahoots with Mr. Eaten (and damning her by...whatever aiding and abetting Mr. Eaten is called, association seems a bit strong), what I'm seeing is putting it somewhere it can be extracted later.

    I have my doubts the Iron Republic. Can't do the linking thing, but trading brandy with the Infernal Sommelier has him point out they never rebelled agains the Judgements SPECIFICALLY. So I'm not convinced the association with the Anarchists isn't simply a business relationship they're expecting to not achieve it's slated goal; yes I've witnessed the transaction where Hell was commisioned to smelt a new Law and i've also seen the inscription that implies the FIngerkings are allied with Hell to some extent. But what clinches it for me is-Hell ultimately WANTS (the transaction of) souls, in the sense they see value in them. As souls are star-spores, it stands to reason they can't entirely agree with the forces that would see them as either potential enemies (I'm pretty sure Lost in Reflections has allusions to Parabola rotting lights with reference to souls), or one more link in the Chain to be broken.

    Also, I just plain don't like tea.

  • EDIT: Actually, I just noticed you yourself put it better than I could have: "Oh dear, this could go very well or very badly."

  • edited by Hattington on 6/30/2017


  • The DTC is not "stockpiling honey" in contradiction of her platform, she is trying to dispose of it. So you simply got that wrong.

    As for Hell's Republic, even if their deals with the Revolutionaries are ultimately insincere, they are still making deals with the Calendar Council, providing them supplies, helping them build weapons, and sponsoring them with a safe haven in which to test out their ideas of a law free world. Hell and Feducci are therefore pretty deep into the Liberation of the Night, way deeper then someone who just happens to have a few casual Revolutionary friends.

    Of course most players have a few casual Revolutionary friends...so the DTC's sin in that regard is no worse then the player with a few a Revolutionary Connected points and no "plotting against the Masters." But Feducci is allied with Hell and Hell supports the Liberation...so Feducci probably has a pretty high "advancing Liberation of the Night" quality.
    edited by Anne Auclair on 6/30/2017



  • Oh, none of the candidates are spotless-and I'm not blind to my own's friends' faults.

    I am forced to admit you make some compelling points, but I've listed some much more obvious ways someone who truly WANTED that honey disposed, period, instead of hanging around as a bargaining chip, could have done so; I only have your word to go by to analyse her sincere intentions with, and right now her actions are speaking for themselves.

    Besides, worst to worst there's another whose interests I advocate for who would benefit from both a) a quasi-ally in the Presbyterate, b) a more cilmbable chain and c) the brass marvels Hell could provide.

    --
    The Dawnburnt Vake-Rider: https://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Hattington
  • +2 link
    LillianAranach
    LillianAranach
    Posts: 45

    6/30/2017
    I felt like the whole honey-well thing was meant to show that she didn't completely know what she was doing. The Campaigner has a good heart assuredly, but she's more idyllic than practical. I strongly disbelieve she's hoarding it for nefarious purposes; I just think that she's a little naive, so she poured a drug, which she labels dangerous, down a well, of all things, in a room where people who are determined can pretty easily break in and steal some.

    --
    They say, "There is a delightfully delectable corruption about Aranach, and she seeks to spread it, all the while revelling in truth and sin in equal parts."

    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Lillian%20Aranach
    +1 link
    Hattington
    Hattington
    Posts: 210

    6/30/2017
    Anne Auclair wrote:
    Hattington wrote:
    In one corner, we have an allegedly prim and proper society dame who's secretly stockpiling massive amounts of honey instead of destroying it like the chaste platform she professes to support...

    ...I judge my candidates a lot by how they operate under crisis, because let's face it-London is one long, eldritch crisis with some very pretty facades thrown over it... The Temperance Campaigner? Either her or one of her associates freaked out hard when I found the aforementioned documents concerning compromise. Feducci? He's a damn good sport.

    Oh dear, there is just so much that is wrong here in terms of basic facts.

    The Temperance Campaigner is not stockpiling honey, she is destroying it by dumping it down a well. And no one in the Campaigners campaign freaks out when you burgle her purse - as you depart you hear the Campaigner's purse traps catching a less successful burglar.



    Hattington wrote:
    Now, I'll put aside the fact Feducci's very real financial strategising, contacts in the Presbyterate and Devillish associates (they have vacuum cleaner! WE NEED THOSE!) because from your point of view those are all downsides. Yes, I am making the case Hell is the lesser evil here considering taking souls doesn't result in incendiary property damage or possesion by snakes.

    Hell supports the Revolutionaries and the Liberation of the Night. One of the centers of Revolutionary activity in the Neath is the Iron Republic, which is Hell's client state. In Sunless Sea, Anarchists = the Iron Republic.

    This support makes sense of course, as Hell is itself controlled by Infernal Revolutionaries, who took power in a Revolution that Feducci fought for.

    Feducci's campaigner manager is a Devil.



  • ...excuse me, am I blind or do the words "has no idea what to do with it all" indicate a marked lack of destruction? Unless you're implying she's in cahoots with Mr. Eaten (and damning her by...whatever aiding and abetting Mr. Eaten is called, association seems a bit strong), what I'm seeing is putting it somewhere it can be extracted later.

    I have my doubts the Iron Republic. Can't do the linking thing, but trading brandy with the Infernal Sommelier has him point out they never rebelled agains the Judgements SPECIFICALLY. So I'm not convinced the association with the Anarchists isn't simply a business relationship they're expecting to not achieve it's slated goal; yes I've witnessed the transaction where Hell was commisioned to smelt a new Law and i've also seen the inscription that implies the FIngerkings are allied with Hell to some extent. But what clinches it for me is-Hell ultimately WANTS (the transaction of) souls, in the sense they see value in them. As souls are star-spores, it stands to reason they can't entirely agree with the forces that would see them as either potential enemies (I'm pretty sure Lost in Reflections has allusions to Parabola rotting lights with reference to souls), or one more link in the Chain to be broken.

    Also, I just plain don't like tea.

  • EDIT: Actually, I just noticed you yourself put it better than I could have: "Oh dear, this could go very well or very badly."

  • edited by Hattington on 6/30/2017

    --
    The Dawnburnt Vake-Rider: https://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Hattington
  • +1 link
    Isaac Zienfried
    Isaac Zienfried
    Posts: 364

    6/30/2017
    Gul al-Ahlaam wrote:

    First, and someone's got to say it, he's not very good at being a spy. He reveals the skin beneath his bandages while he eats, often forgets to keep his limp or his false voice up, openly interacts with Presbyterate traders and officials on the docks, and, most damningly of all, basically reveals his nature to any well-read Black Ribbon duelist who challenges him simply by returning from the dead. Plus, his main rival, the Devout Intriguer, knows far more about his movements than she reasonably ought to. And so do we!

    Given how the Presbyterate operates, this could all be on purpose. They are just as fond of misinformation as they are of guarding knowledge,

    --
    Isaac Zienfried, 'The Vacillating Belligerent.'
    A gentleman of complicated loyalties, complicated morality, and complicated goals.
    But really, it's hard to keep things simple down here!
    +1 link
    Hattington
    Hattington
    Posts: 210

    6/30/2017
    Anne Auclair wrote:
    Hattington wrote:
    Besides, worst to worst there's another whose interests I advocate for who would benefit from both a) a quasi-ally in the Presbyterate, b) a more cilmbable chain and c) the brass marvels Hell could provide.


    "An evening of fiery speeches" wrote:


    You settle into the front row beside the Affectionate Devil, who favours you with a flashing smile and squeezes your shoulder. The woman at the lectern begins to speak of the wonders of the Iron Republic, the city of anarchists: their freedom from restraint and tradition, their successful overthrow of the laws of nature, the riches and glory to be found in the embrace of freedom... She takes some time to thank the infernal patrons of the Republic for assisting them in "shattering the chains of earth and Heaven."

    Fascinating stuff, if a little disturbing. In conversation afterwards, you can tell your friend is impressed by how much of the lecture you've retained and understood.



    "A veteran of the battles of that old city" wrote:
    Feducci's campaign manager transpires to be a very Indulgent Devil, whose red eyes smoulder like the rising of Mars. "Of course," he tells you in a voice like molten honey, "Feducci has helped us in the past, when the apparatus of state weighed on our liberty. When we felled all thrones, he was in the vanguard. I think he rather misses such grand sport."


    If even the most indirect of connections to the Liberation of the Night is as bad as you say, to the point that knowing a handful of anarchists is disqualifying, then you should abandon Feducci right now. Because he's neck deep in it.
    .
    edited by Anne Auclair on 6/30/2017



  • Putting aside the fact you're using statements from very ambiguous contexts, the fact that you're putting words in my mouth when i've already stated my opinion on the ambiguous relationship between London's revolutions relative to Hell's revolutions and the fact that a certain deep sea event in Sunless Seas shows that we haven't grasped the full scope of the Liberation's nature.

    I find it very peculiar that you're using something I said about WELCOMING similar conditions to reach this conclusion.

    More to the point, there is nothing you, personally, can say to make me change my opinion. I draw my conclusions first from which candidate I find the most interesting, secondly from what information there is on how their campaigns are progressing and thirdly from their prior backgrounds.

    --
    The Dawnburnt Vake-Rider: https://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Hattington
  • +1 link
    Isaac Zienfried
    Isaac Zienfried
    Posts: 364

    6/30/2017
    Conrad Baltar wrote:

    Reference is made somewhere that once prisoners honey gets sent to the Surface, it loses it's more Neathy qualities and becomes just honey. But for the life of me, I can't remember if that was Fallen London or Sunless Sea.

    SS, when visiting Naples. It mentions mushroom wines are snubbed on the Surface, prisoner's honey loses its magic up there, and the only thing from down below people like is GLORIOUS COFFEE.

    Anne Auclair wrote:
    their purpose is to flood you with false information so that everything seems unreal.

    I want to avoid real-world politics like the plague, but I do feel compelled to point out this is an actual tactic used in the real-world "Great Game."
    edited by Isaac Zienfried on 6/30/2017

    --
    Isaac Zienfried, 'The Vacillating Belligerent.'
    A gentleman of complicated loyalties, complicated morality, and complicated goals.
    But really, it's hard to keep things simple down here!
    +1 link
    Conrad Baltar
    Conrad Baltar
    Posts: 42

    6/30/2017
    Isaac Zienfried wrote:
    SS, when visiting Naples. It mentions mushroom wines are snubbed on the Surface, prisoner's honey loses its magic up there, and the only thing from down below people like is GLORIOUS COFFEE.


    Many thanks sir. So here we have it, a way of disposing of honey without tipping it down a well/into the ocean. It just requires a zailor merchant willing to go to and from the Surface with all that honey and not touch a drop of the cargo. If someone could let the DTC know...

    --
    Conrad Baltar is open to all social invites when in London.

    A proud Feducci Campaigner. "Fair Play, Fair Game, Fair London."

    "Some may view what Feducci does as cheating and scheming. Others may view it as pragmatism or planning ahead and ensuring victory at any cost. That is a matter of perspective. And that matter of perspective is what draws the line between those of us willing to support him, and those of us who oppose him."

    To all Feducci supporters, please let me know (via private messaging or in the main Feducci thread) if you require any Wounds or Nightmares reduction, I'll do my best to assist you over the rest of the week.


    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Conrad%20Baltar
    +1 link
    Anne Auclair
    Anne Auclair
    Posts: 2215

    6/30/2017
    Conrad Baltar wrote:
    Isaac Zienfried wrote:
    SS, when visiting Naples. It mentions mushroom wines are snubbed on the Surface, prisoner's honey loses its magic up there, and the only thing from down below people like is GLORIOUS COFFEE.


    Many thanks sir. So here we have it, a way of disposing of honey without tipping it down a well/into the ocean. It just requires a zailor merchant willing to go to and from the Surface with all that honey and not touch a drop of the cargo. If someone could let the DTC know...

    That sounds like the plot of an Exceptional Story.

    --
    http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Anne%20Auclair
    +1 link
    Optimatum
    Optimatum
    Posts: 3666

    6/30/2017
    Anchovies wrote:
    Gul al-Ahlaam wrote:
    The military is basically defunct.
    Excuse me? I believe you mean "the military is very busy". Building a living machine-god is no small task, and the Masters' red tape was getting in the way. The great work must go on! Bright-Eyed Sequencer for Mayor!

    *quietly indicates my mantelpiece item*

    That's the Admiralty. The military has been basically defunct since the failed invasion of Hell.

    --
    Optimatum, a ruthless and merciful gentleman. No plant battles, Affluent Photographer requests, or healing offers; all other social actions welcome.

    Want a sip of Cider? Just say hi!

    PM me for information enigmatic or Fated. Though the forum please, not FL itself.
    +1 link
    Hattington
    Hattington
    Posts: 210

    6/30/2017
    Isaac Zienfried wrote:
    To be fair, the Campaigner isn't the one playing dirty. Some of us on the campaign have taken on that burden so the lady can keep her hands clean.



  • If that's an incentive to vote against her on general principle, it's succeeding magnificently.

    --
    The Dawnburnt Vake-Rider: https://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Hattington
  • +1 link
    Gul al-Ahlaam
    Gul al-Ahlaam
    Posts: 225

    6/29/2017
    I think you're missing the point. Just because Feducci is a badass that can return from the dead doesn't change that it's not a fair fight. This is a fight to the permanent death, and Feducci never makes it a point to explain just how damnably hard it is to end him.

  • Have you ever dueled Feducci? When you kill him, even though the death isn't permanent, he gives you the win anyway! So long as you inflict what would on an ordinary man be the permanent death, he awards you the victory and graciously accepts defeat! That's the opposite of cheating.

    --
    The Uncanny Hierophant.
    The Jewel-Eyed Prince.
  • +1 link




    Powered by Jitbit Forum 8.0.2.0 © 2006-2013 Jitbit Software