 Koenig Posts: 466
7/14/2015
|
Unfortunately, no. Writing short stories are outclassed by other options once you become a person of some importance. Early game however they are still a good method of getting cash for the necessities.
--
Koenig: Extraordinary. Invisible. Shattering. Legendary.
  
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Erika Posts: 528
7/18/2015
|
If anyone's curious about the epa of random things (including grinds!) here's a good starting point. It doesn't have the epa of any of the short stories, perhaps someone could add them!
--
Where the sun is hot, the moon is beautiful, and mysterious lights pass overhead while we all pretend to sleep. Going on a fate expedition? I'm collecting data! Help me? "Bottles of Oblivion" drunk in the name of content: 57 Catboxes (send more!) opened in the name of science: 1093 Fancy a friend?
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 Happy Londoner Posts: 74
7/18/2015
|
Cecil Palmer wrote:
If anyone's curious about the epa of random things (including grinds!) here's a good starting point. It doesn't have the epa of any of the short stories, perhaps someone could add them!
Thanks for this advice! I'll have a look.
-- My profile: http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Happy~Londoner
|
|
|
0
link
|
 marcmagus Posts: 168
7/20/2015
|
mmk wrote:
does anybody use writing short stories for echo grind? Is it worthwhile taking into account both the epa and the price of potential boosting materials?
No longer, but I did back when I was a Journalist and a bit after becoming an Author. I calculated mean epa varying from 0.85 (stopping at 50 potential) up to 1.28 (stopping at 100 potential). I didn't do the math beyond that because I was interested in other activities, I assume succeeding at all checks, I assume already having relevant boost materials to spend (I cost them at their sale value), and remember this is the mean from a single luck check encompassing a lot of actions, so until you've been grinding through a lot of actions you will probably have a pretty high variance.
Should give you a sense of whether you're still early enough in the game for it to be worthwhile, though. Revisiting this, 1.28 isn't too bad; maybe I'll see what the numbers look like for potentially celebrated and potentially classic works and do a full write-up sometime.
-- marcmagus, a scholar of the Correspondence of some minor note and bold explorer of the new Unterzee.
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 Erika Posts: 528
7/20/2015
|
marcmagus wrote:
I assume already having relevant boost materials to spend (I cost them at their sale value)
Actually, that would slightly detriment your epa, considering most items can be gotten at greater values than 1 echo per action. So, assuming your math is correct, you'd be looking at an epa higher than 1.28.
--
Where the sun is hot, the moon is beautiful, and mysterious lights pass overhead while we all pretend to sleep. Going on a fate expedition? I'm collecting data! Help me? "Bottles of Oblivion" drunk in the name of content: 57 Catboxes (send more!) opened in the name of science: 1093 Fancy a friend?
|
|
|
0
link
|
 xKiv Posts: 846
7/21/2015
|
Cecil Palmer wrote:
marcmagus wrote:
I assume already having relevant boost materials to spend (I cost them at their sale value)
Actually, that would slightly detriment your epa, considering most items can be gotten at greater values than 1 echo per action. So, assuming your math is correct, you'd be looking at an epa higher than 1.28.
That's incorrect thinking. Counting your epa as if the only choice is between spending the supplies and selling them at the bazaar will almost always result in epa higher than anything sustainable
Well. Assuming that writing a story takes A actions, E worth of supplies, and has rewards worth R: Calculating as if requiring supplies is equivalent to decreased reward: 1.28=(R-E)/A Calculating with farming supplies at rate F (worth/action, so farming them takes E/F actions): epa=R/(A+E/F) when is epa>1.28 epa=R/(A+E/F)>1.28=(R-E)/A // multiply by A and A+E/F, both of which are positive R*A > (R-E)*(A+E/F) // expand R*A > R*A + RE/F-EE/F // rearrange additions and subtractions EE/F > RE/F // divide by E/F, which is positive E > R
so increasing epa is possible only if the original epa was negative.
Also, when considering the worth of spending supplies that I already have, a more balanced comparison is between "spend the supplies and A actions the get R reward" and "sell the supplies for E 'reward' and spend A actions doing my best repeatable grind at rate G". Compare R and E+AG. I won't spend the time to compare these now, but from what I remember, E was always so high that you should always just sell your supplies and go somewhere else.
-- https://www.fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/xKiv - a witchful, percussive, dangermous and shadowry scholar of coexplodence, hopsidirean, and walker of fallen kitties.
|
|
|
+2
link
|
 Happy Londoner Posts: 74
7/21/2015
|
xKiv wrote:
Cecil Palmer wrote:
marcmagus wrote:
I assume already having relevant boost materials to spend (I cost them at their sale value)
Actually, that would slightly detriment your epa, considering most items can be gotten at greater values than 1 echo per action. So, assuming your math is correct, you'd be looking at an epa higher than 1.28. That's incorrect thinking. Counting your epa as if the only choice is between spending the supplies and selling them at the bazaar will almost always result in epa higher than anything sustainable
Well. Assuming that writing a story takes A actions, E worth of supplies, and has rewards worth R: Calculating as if requiring supplies is equivalent to decreased reward: 1.28=(R-E)/A Calculating with farming supplies at rate F (worth/action, so farming them takes E/F actions): epa=R/(A+E/F) when is epa>1.28 epa=R/(A+E/F)>1.28=(R-E)/A // multiply by A and A+E/F, both of which are positive R*A > (R-E)*(A+E/F) // expand R*A > R*A + RE/F-EE/F // rearrange additions and subtractions EE/F > RE/F // divide by E/F, which is positive E > R
so increasing epa is possible only if the original epa was negative.
Also, when considering the worth of spending supplies that I already have, a more balanced comparison is between "spend the supplies and A actions the get R reward" and "sell the supplies for E 'reward' and spend A actions doing my best repeatable grind at rate G". Compare R and E+AG. I won't spend the time to compare these now, but from what I remember, E was always so high that you should always just sell your supplies and go somewhere else.
That made me feel stupid, logically illiterate and happy (that I am) at the same time. But mostly stupid. Though the final point I did manage to grasp.
-- My profile: http://fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/Happy~Londoner
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Erika Posts: 528
7/22/2015
|
xKiv wrote:
That's incorrect thinking. Counting your epa as if the only choice is between spending the supplies and selling them at the bazaar will almost always result in epa higher than anything sustainable
Well. Assuming that writing a story takes A actions, E worth of supplies, and has rewards worth R: Calculating as if requiring supplies is equivalent to decreased reward: 1.28=(R-E)/A Calculating with farming supplies at rate F (worth/action, so farming them takes E/F actions): epa=R/(A+E/F) when is epa>1.28 epa=R/(A+E/F)>1.28=(R-E)/A // multiply by A and A+E/F, both of which are positive R*A > (R-E)*(A+E/F) // expand R*A > R*A + RE/F-EE/F // rearrange additions and subtractions EE/F > RE/F // divide by E/F, which is positive E > R
so increasing epa is possible only if the original epa was negative.
Also, when considering the worth of spending supplies that I already have, a more balanced comparison is between "spend the supplies and A actions the get R reward" and "sell the supplies for E 'reward' and spend A actions doing my best repeatable grind at rate G". Compare R and E+AG. I won't spend the time to compare these now, but from what I remember, E was always so high that you should always just sell your supplies and go somewhere else.
I. Uh. Couldn't follow most of that. I do now see that I was wrong, and that epa would only be increase if you were gaining the source items at a higher epa. I'm not sure why that didn't occur to me in the first place. Count me a little less ignorant I guess?
--
Where the sun is hot, the moon is beautiful, and mysterious lights pass overhead while we all pretend to sleep. Going on a fate expedition? I'm collecting data! Help me? "Bottles of Oblivion" drunk in the name of content: 57 Catboxes (send more!) opened in the name of science: 1093 Fancy a friend?
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 genesis Posts: 924
7/22/2015
|
xKiv wrote:
R*A > (R-E)*(A+E/F) // expand R*A > R*A + RE/F-EE/F // rearrange additions and subtractions
I think you are missing the "-E*A" term here. It doesn't affect your ultimate point but if less mathematically inclined people were trying to follow they might miss an implied step where that term disappears.
-- http://fallenlondon.com/Profile/mikey_thinkin
Keeping track of incomplete content and loose ends in Fallen London
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Trodgmey Posts: 164
7/29/2015
|
Some day I'm finally going to get someone to pay attention to my Corpsecage Island/Shrine of the Deep Blue Heaven grind that in my data averaged ~1.35 epa ( http://community.failbettergames.com/topic4344-grinding-watchful-and-persuasive.aspx ). It does require largely forgoing cards and other London actions while at sea, and to make the epa effective requires being at sea for long stretches of time, but can be made even slightly more lucrative by nabbing a plated seal while out amongst the waves (this requires playing your cards right with troubled waters but is worth it IMO). edited by Trodgmey on 7/29/2015
-- Trodgmey -- an otherwise pleasant chap with a peculiar obsession with the first four cities. http://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Trodgmey
|
|
|
0
link
|
 marcmagus Posts: 168
7/29/2015
|
I completely forgot you could use notes for supplies, thanks! The new zailing mechanics and the newish increased rewards for Collate your <whatever> research will boost this, too. (You could take some amount of the other notes instead, cash them in at your lodgings for collated research, then do another round of preparatory research to trade those back for all sorts including archaeological notes)
Plated seals aren't difficult to nab while you're out there, either, though I haven't yet figured out how many actions they're likely to cost.
-- marcmagus, a scholar of the Correspondence of some minor note and bold explorer of the new Unterzee.
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Trodgmey Posts: 164
7/29/2015
|
marcmagus wrote:
I completely forgot you could use notes for supplies, thanks! The new zailing mechanics and the newish increased rewards for Collate your <whatever> research will boost this, too. (You could take some amount of the other notes instead, cash them in at your lodgings for collated research, then do another round of preparatory research to trade those back for all sorts including archaeological notes)
Plated seals aren't difficult to nab while you're out there, either, though I haven't yet figured out how many actions they're likely to cost.
I confess I've been a landlubber for a few months while doing some London-based grinding, so I haven't had a chance to try it out with the new zailing mechanics (okay, fine, I'd forgotten there were new zailing mechanics in the first place).
I'll probably head out to sea in a bit after I grind out some correspondence plaques, and I'll try to keep some data.
-- Trodgmey -- an otherwise pleasant chap with a peculiar obsession with the first four cities. http://www.fallenlondon.com/Profile/Trodgmey
|
|
|
0
link
|
 xKiv Posts: 846
7/30/2015
|
genesis wrote:
xKiv wrote:
R*A > (R-E)*(A+E/F) // expand R*A > R*A + RE/F-EE/F // rearrange additions and subtractions
I think you are missing the "-E*A" term here. It doesn't affect your ultimate point but if less mathematically inclined people were trying to follow they might miss an implied step where that term disappears.
Oh, huh.
R*A > R*A + RE/F-EE/F -AE // rearrange additions and subtractions EE/F > RE/F -AE // *F/(AE) E/A > R/A - F F > (R-E)/A
...
so it changes my conclusion from "increasing epa this way is possible only when the original epa was negative" to "... only when the original epa was lower than the epa of acquiring the necessary supplies". In which case it's even more profitable to just keep farming the supplies instead.
-- https://www.fallenlondon.storynexus.com/Profile/xKiv - a witchful, percussive, dangermous and shadowry scholar of coexplodence, hopsidirean, and walker of fallen kitties.
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 Erika Posts: 528
7/31/2015
|
xKiv wrote:
so it changes my conclusion from "increasing epa this way is possible only when the original epa was negative" to "... only when the original epa was lower than the epa of acquiring the necessary supplies". In which case it's even more profitable to just keep farming the supplies instead.
yay! That's what I said! I'm slightly more intelligent than I thought!
--
Where the sun is hot, the moon is beautiful, and mysterious lights pass overhead while we all pretend to sleep. Going on a fate expedition? I'm collecting data! Help me? "Bottles of Oblivion" drunk in the name of content: 57 Catboxes (send more!) opened in the name of science: 1093 Fancy a friend?
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 Kade Carrion (an_ocelot) Posts: 1372
11/11/2015
|
Jeremy Avalon wrote:
On the other hand, if you Gawp, it takes 5 actions on average to reduce 10 CP of Nightmares, and you get 0.95 EPA at the same time, so you get a total of 10 * 2.5 + 5 * 0.95 = 29.75 Echoes per 16 actions, or ~1.86 EPA. And then all the Wounds disappear from using the Cider again.
Continuing discussion from here: yes, I tend to Gawp when my Nightmares get high enough from the Cider cards to clear out non-discardable menace cards, but I almost never go all the way down to zero by Gawping, just down enough to clear my hand. Instead I go to the Nadir or I use one of the Doctor Schlomo cards (-3 CP Nightmares + 2.50E on rare success or -6 CP Nightmares).
And because I am a GIANT DORK, I just did the math on the Nadir and came out to 5.92 EPA (on average, of course! And you can tweak that in your favor by choosing when to bail)--here's the spreadsheet--note that this is personal to me and your unlock qualities may vary, but I hope it gives people a starting point. edited by an_ocelot on 11/12/2015
-- Social Actions: send them to Kade Carrion (she/her; no Tournament of Lilies, please). an_ocelot has gone NORTH and cannot benefit from social actions!
Possibly-Useful Things: Spreadsheets and hints and link collections, oh my.
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 Mr. Mercutio Posts: 133
11/11/2015
|
Thanks for sharing the spreadsheet, ocelot. Some good math in there.
-- Mr. Mercutio Immortal. Rich. Only moderately insane.
Want a taste of immortality? Reach out to me in-game to ask for a sip of Hesperidean Cider. Please follow Ocelot's guide to asking here.
New to our dark city? Send me a message in-game and I will respond when I can with a welcome gift!
I welcome most social actions, so feel free to send them to me. Just please don't ask me to Loiter Suspiciously or to help with the Affluent Photographer. I have disavowed all knowledge of her.
Galatea LaChance She has gone North, and none shall know what she found there.
|
|
|
+1
link
|
 Kade Carrion (an_ocelot) Posts: 1372
11/11/2015
|
Thanks! I hope people will let me know of any errors they happen to spot.
-- Social Actions: send them to Kade Carrion (she/her; no Tournament of Lilies, please). an_ocelot has gone NORTH and cannot benefit from social actions!
Possibly-Useful Things: Spreadsheets and hints and link collections, oh my.
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Kaigen Posts: 530
11/12/2015
|
Looks good to me, and it's good to see some numbers behind the received wisdom that the Nadir is a good place to visit weekly. Personally, though, I always play "Where did the Rosers Go?" and "Speak to the Urchins," since even without guaranteed success, expected payout is high.
-- Just a simple doctor with a chess habit. Publisher of The Flit Dispatch.
"One must remember that the impossible is, alas, always possible." -Jacques Derrida
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Kade Carrion (an_ocelot) Posts: 1372
11/12/2015
|
Oh, I did miss than you get 1E for failing the Rosers, but the wiki says you don't get anything for failing talking to the Urchins . . . ?
-- Social Actions: send them to Kade Carrion (she/her; no Tournament of Lilies, please). an_ocelot has gone NORTH and cannot benefit from social actions!
Possibly-Useful Things: Spreadsheets and hints and link collections, oh my.
|
|
|
0
link
|
 Optimatum Posts: 3666
11/12/2015
|
I assume Kaigen means on average it's profitable even without guaranteed success on individual attempts, somewhat like the Fidgeting Writer.
-- Optimatum, a ruthless and merciful gentleman. No plant battles, Affluent Photographer requests, or healing offers; all other social actions welcome.
Want a sip of Cider? Just say hi!
PM me for information enigmatic or Fated. Though the forum please, not FL itself.
|
|
|
+1
link
|